Landmark Ruling Limits Definition of 'Woman' in Single-Sex Spaces Across UK

The UK Supreme Court has reached a unanimous decision stating that the legal definitions of “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 pertain solely to biological sex, rather than gender identity. This ruling carries significant consequences for policies related to single-sex spaces and representation.

The ruling, issued on Wednesday, arises from a 2018 legal challenge brought forth by the feminist advocacy group For Women Scotland (FWS) regarding the Scottish Parliament’s Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act. The Act sought to enhance gender diversity by mandating that 50 percent of non-executive public board members be “women,” clearly incorporating transgender women with gender recognition certificates (GRCs) within that definition.

The FWS contended that this redefinition was at odds with the UK-wide Equality Act, which outlines protections based on sex and various other characteristics. Following the endorsement of the law by lower Scottish courts, FWS sought to appeal to the Supreme Court in 2024, garnering support from notable figures, including author JK Rowling.

On Wednesday, five justices sided with FWS, determining that “woman” in the Equality Act pertains solely to individuals born female, irrespective of a trans woman's legal transition status. The court indicated that understanding “sex” as gender-recognized sex would make the legal definitions of “man” and “woman” unclear and at odds with the purpose of the Act.

Justice Patrick Hodge highlighted that the ruling does not eliminate legal protections for transgender individuals, who continue to be protected under the characteristic of “gender reassignment.” Nonetheless, the court specified that certain rights — especially concerning single-sex areas such as shelters, changing rooms, and counseling services — could be legally designated for biological women.

The responses to the ruling have been sharply polarized. Feminist organizations praised the verdict as a safeguard for women's rights, whereas LGBTQ+ advocacy groups and certain Scottish officials voiced worries about heightened marginalization and discrimination.

The case originated in Scotland, but the Supreme Court’s interpretation now applies throughout the UK, encompassing England and Wales, thereby establishing a national legal precedent regarding the definitions of gender and sex in law.

‍