President Chester A. Arthur nominated Justice Samuel Blatchford to the court on this day in 1882. According to Justia, Blatchford was a “precocious talent” who “enrolled in Columbia College (now Columbia University) when he was 13 years old.”
At the Court
The court has indicated that it may announce opinions on Friday, March 20, at 10 a.m. EDT.
The interim docket case on the Trump administration’s effort to remove protected status from Syrian nationals is now fully briefed, and the court’s decision could come at any time.
The Trump administration has also asked the court to allow it to remove protected status from Haitian nationals. Haitians’ response to that request is due on Monday by 12 p.m. EDT.
The court will next hear arguments on Monday, March 23, the first day of its March sitting.
Morning Reads
US customs agency says building system for tariff refunds is 40% to 80% complete
Tom Hals, Reuters
In a Thursday court filing with the U.S. Court of International Trade, Brandon Lord, an official with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, said the “government’s work to build a four-part system to refund $166 billion in illegal tariff collections with interest is between 40% and 80% complete,” according to Reuters. “CBP did not say how quickly refunds would be paid. More than 330,000 importers paid the tariffs on 53 million shipments and only around 21,000 were registered with its system to receive a refund, according to a court filing last week.”
Costco sued by shopper in potential tariff class action case
Sophie Brams, The Hill
In December, Costco sued the Trump administration over its tariffs. Now, those tariffs have been struck down by the Supreme Court, and a “Costco shopper in Illinois has sued the retail giant in an attempt to secure refunds for U.S. customers,” according to The Hill. “The proposed class action lawsuit seeks to prevent what is described as ‘double recovery’ by Costco, arguing that the corporation should be required to return any money it collects from tariff refunds to consumers because those costs were initially passed on through product prices.”
Ron DeSantis Wants Speedy Executions, and Lots of Them
Adam Liptak, The New York Times
After executing 19 inmates in 2025, which was the second-most executions in a state “in a single year since the Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976,” Florida is on track to “execute 20 people in 2026 – more than were put to death nationally in 2020, 2021 or 2022,” according to The New York Times. Meanwhile, the Florida Legislature has, in recent years, “enacted a series of laws of doubtful constitutionality” that allow for imposition of the death penalty after “crimes involving the sexual abuse of children” and after a nonunanimous jury vote, and which require the death penalty when “unauthorized immigrants … commit capital crimes.” The laws are expected to prompt lawsuits, and “the law on the sexual abuse of children seemed calculated to let the U.S. Supreme Court reconsider” a 2008 decision stating that “crimes against people that do not involve killing, including the rape of a child, could not be punished by death.”
Hawley unveils bill to ban abortion pill, strip FDA approval
Benjamin S. Weiss, Courthouse News Service
On Wednesday, Sen. Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, unveiled a bill that would require the immediate withdrawal of “federal safety approvals for the medication abortion drug mifepristone,” according to Courthouse News Service. His measure “comes months after the Trump administration said it’s taking another look at the medicine’s safety – and years after the Supreme Court threw out a challenge to mifepristone’s longstanding status as an approved abortion medication by the U.S. Food and Drug administration.” Medication abortions – and lawsuits over medication abortions – have become more common in the four years since “the high court overturned Roe v. Wade and the constitutional right to have an abortion.”
Oklahoma AG challenges Jewish charter school vote
Nuria Martinez-Keel, Oklahoma Voice
Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond is taking the Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board to court over its recent rejection of an application from a Jewish school. Rather than argue that the board should have approved the school, Drummond contends that the board’s denial was strategically designed to improve the school’s position in a forthcoming religious discrimination lawsuit, which some expect to one day reach the Supreme Court. “He said there were multiple reasons to deny the application, but the board engineered its vote to focus solely on the religious aspect. He asked an Oklahoma County district judge on Wednesday to order the board to issue a new and complete rejection letter that includes all valid grounds for denying the school,” such as flawed enrollment projects, according to Oklahoma Voice.
On Site
When presidents attack the Supreme Court
With his comments on the tariffs ruling, President Donald Trump has furthered his reputation as a president comfortable complaining about the Supreme Court. But to be clear, he is not the first president – and he almost certainly won’t be the last – to do so. Here’s an overview of some of the most famous conflicts between presidents and the court.
An interview with Jerry Goldman, founder of the Oyez Project
The first entry in SCOTUSblog’s new SCOTUS Innovators series features Jerry Goldman, founder of the Oyez project. Oyez was the first website to digitize and share thousands of hours of Supreme Court oral arguments and opinion announcements.
Birthright citizenship: Originalism 101
In a column for SCOTUSblog, Samarth Desai explored several briefs filed in the birthright citizenship case, contending that "the Trump administration and its allies" "are flunking Originalism 101."
Podcasts
Supreme Court Justices Spar Publicly
David French and Sarah Isgur break down new polling showing historic lows in trust for the Supreme Court, debate whether a public disagreement between Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Ketanji Brown Jackson helps or hurts the institution, and dive into oral arguments on property seizures and witness testimony rights.
Chief Justice William Howard Taft
William Howard Taft, a man of many superlatives. The first president to use a car for official transport, the last president to keep a cow on the White House lawn, and of course, the only person to serve as both a justice and president (though others gave it a try). Between the last two points (the 1,500-pound Pauline Wayne enraptured the White House press corps, some of whom covered the cow “like a tabloid would a Kardashian”), we have almost too much to talk about.
The 10th chief justice was born in Cincinnati in 1857 and was the son of a former secretary of war and attorney general under President Ulysses S. Grant. Like his father, Taft graduated from Yale, coming second in his class before studying law at the University of Cincinnati. After he graduated in 1880 (and after having campaigned for several Republican candidates in that year’s election), Taft started in private practice in Cincinnati, then briefly served as an assistant prosecuting attorney. In 1887, Ohio’s governor named Taft to be a judge on the Ohio Superior Court, and, in 1888, he won a five-year term.
Although Taft’s name came up for the Supreme Court even back then, President Benjamin Harrison instead appointed him solicitor general. (Taft was quite successful in that role, winning 15 of the 18 cases he argued in front of the Supreme Court.) Taft was then named to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, where he served from 1892 until 1900. Under President Theodore Roosevelt, he was twice offered the job of a justice on the Supreme Court but twice declined – one of those times due to the post he assumed in 1901 as Civilian Governor of the Philippines.
In 1904, Taft agreed to become Roosevelt’s secretary of war, and in 1908 defeated the Democratic candidate, William Jennings Bryan, to become president. Taft served one term, in which the public saw him as a “large, genial” fellow. (At one point Taft reached 332 pounds, which was not helped by his typical 12-ounce steak breakfast – though the popular bathtub myth is false.)
Since we’re not here to learn about Taft’s presidency, we’ll treat it as he did. Before and after serving as chief executive, Taft expressed that his chief (pun intended) goal was to serve on the Supreme Court. Indeed, he wrote his brother in 1905 that, “My ambition is to become a justice of the Supreme Court. I presume, however, there are very few men who would refuse to accept the nomination of the Republican party for the presidency, and I am not an exception.” And after being on the court for a few years, he remarked, “I don’t remember that I ever was President.”
To be fair, Taft’s wife, Helen “Nellie” Herron, had a different perspective. Nellie much preferred the role of “first lady of the country” as opposed to “first lady of the court” and was apparently instrumental in pushing Taft to initially accept the Philippines commission and run for president. (Nellie, among her other accomplishments, established equal treatment of White House staff and planted the first cherry tree at D.C.’s Title Basin.)
Taft didn’t campaign in the 1912 election given the tradition that incumbent presidents not do so, and after his defeat, he became a constitutional law professor at Yale. Between 1916 and 1919, Taft also joined the League to Enforce Peace, which pushed for a League of Nations, and acted as joint chairman of the War Labor Board from 1918 to 1919.
After Republican President Warren Harding won the 1920 election, Taft had another chance to serve on the Supreme Court – which he enthusiastically took in June 1921 when Harding nominated him to the chief justiceship. The Senate confirmed Taft’s appointment that same day.
Taft’s most recognized legal contributions to the court include rulings restricting Congress’ power, such as through Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. in 1922, which voided a federal law taxing products made with child labor. In the same year, Taft ruled in Stafford v. Wallace that the federal government can regulate certain activities to prevent unfair competition through the commerce clause. And then there is his 1926 decision in Myers v. United States, which supported the president’s power to remove “administrative officers” – an issue at the heart of several cases this very term.
But perhaps Taft’s greatest impact as chief justice was in the realm of judicial administration, which has earned him the designation as “father of the modern U.S. Supreme Court.” Among other things, Taft established the court’s practice of controlling its own caseload, reorganized the structure of the lower courts, and oversaw the construction of the Supreme Court Building – telling architects to create something “of dignity and importance” (recall that before this, the court was confined to a small space in the U.S. Capitol).
“[T]here have been two chief justices who really deeply cared about judicial administration,” said Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in 1997 when giving an introduction for the Supreme Court Historical Society’s lecture series on the chief justices of the 19th and 20th centuries. “One was Chief Justice Warren Burger … and the other was William Howard Taft.”
O’Connor continued, “Taft was first and foremost a judge. He served as president for one term, it’s true. But what he really loved was being a judge. He cared about how the courts function, how this court functioned. He worked with Congress to get more discretion for this court in deciding what cases to take. He did so much that helped improve the system.”
Taft retired from the court in 1930 due to health problems, and died a month later at age 72 from heart disease. He was both the first president and the first justice to be interred at Arlington National Cemetery, and remains the only justice to have a state funeral.
SCOTUS Quote
“As the plurality must acknowledge, the ordinary meaning of ‘tangible object’ is ‘a discrete thing that possesses physical form.’ A fish is, of course, a discrete thing that possesses physical form. See generally Dr. Seuss, One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish (1960).”
— Justice Elena Kagan in Yates v. United States (2015)
The post SCOTUStoday for Friday, March 13 appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

